Do All Roads Lead To God?

“So we’ve established that truth can be known. In fact, it’s undeniable. But so what? Can’t all religions be true? Unfortunately, it’s not just the secular world that’s confused about this question; even some church pastors have trouble with it.
Seminary professor Ronald Nash heard of a good example of this. He told us of a student of his who went home to Bowling Green, Kentucky, for Christmas break a couple of years ago. While on break, this Bible-believing student decided to be adventurous one Sunday and attend a church that he had never attended before. But as soon as the pastor uttered the first sentence of his sermon, the student realized he had made a mistake—the pastor was contradicting the Bible.

“The theme of my sermon this morning,” the pastor began, “is that all religious beliefs are true!” The student squirmed in his seat as the pastor went on to assure each member of the congregation that every religious belief they had was “true!”

When the sermon was over, the student wanted to slip out unnoticed, but the heavy-set, robed pastor was waiting at the door bear-hugging each passing congregant.
“Son,” the pastor boomed upon greeting the student, “where are you from?”

“Actually, I’m from Bowling Green, sir. I’m home on break from seminary.”

“Seminary! Good. So what religious beliefs do you have, Son?”

“I’d rather not say, sir.”

“Why not, Son?”

“Because I don’t want to offend you, sir.”

“Oh, Son, you can’t offend me. Besides, it doesn’t matter what your beliefs are—they’re true. So what do you believe?”

“Okay,” the student relented. He leaned toward the pastor, cupped his hand around his mouth, and whispered, “Sir, I believe that you are going to hell!”

The pastor’s face turned bright red as he struggled to respond. “I, ah, guess I, ah, made a mistake! All religious beliefs cannot be true because yours certainly aren’t true!”

Indeed, as the pastor realized, religious beliefs cannot all be true, because many religious beliefs are contradictory—they teach opposites. For example, conservative Christians believe that those who haven’t accepted Christ as their Savior have chosen hell as their ultimate destination. It’s often overlooked, but many Muslims believe the same about non-Muslims—they’re headed for hell as well. And Hindus generally believe that everyone, regardless of beliefs, is caught in an indefinite cycle of reincarnation based on works. These contradictory beliefs can’t all be true.

In fact, world religions have more contradictory beliefs than complementary ones. The notion that all religions teach basically the same thing—that we ought to love one another—demonstrates a serious misunderstanding of world religions. While most religions have some kind of similar moral code because God has implanted right and wrong on our consciences, they disagree on virtually every major issue, including the nature of God, the nature of man, sin, salvation, heaven, hell, and creation!

Think about it: the nature of God, the nature of man, sin, salvation, heaven, hell, and creation. Those are the biggies! Here are a few of those big differences:

Jews, Christians, and Muslims believe in different versions of a theistic God, while most Hindus and New Agers believe that everything that exists is part of an impersonal, pantheistic force they call God.

Many Hindus believe that evil is a complete illusion, while Christians, Muslims, and Jews believe that evil is real.

Christians believe that people are saved by grace while all other religions, if they believe in salvation at all, teach some kind of salvation by good works (the definition of “good” and what one is saved from varies greatly).

These are just a few of the many essential differences. So much for the idea that all religions teach basically the same things!

While most religions have some beliefs that are true, not all religious beliefs can be true because they are mutually exclusive—they teach opposites. In other words, some religious beliefs must be wrong. But you’re not supposed to say that in America today. You’re supposed to be “tolerant” of all religious beliefs. And in our culture today, tolerance no longer means to put up with something you believe to be false (after all, you don’t tolerate things you agree with). Tolerance now means that you’re supposed to accept every belief as true! In a religious context, this is known as religious pluralism—the belief that all religions are true. There are a number of problems with this new definition of tolerance.

First, let us say that we are thankful that we have religious freedom in this country, and we don’t believe in imposing a religion legislatively (see our book Legislating Morality). We are well aware of the dangers of religious intolerance and believe that we should accept and respect people who have different religious beliefs. But that doesn’t mean that “personally we ought to embrace the impossible notion that all religious beliefs are true. Since mutually exclusive religious beliefs cannot be true, it makes no sense to pretend that they are. In fact, on an individual level it can be dangerous to do so. If Christianity is true, then it’s dangerous to your eternal destiny not to be a Christian. Likewise, if Islam is true, then it’s dangerous to your eternal destiny not to be a Muslim.

Second, the claim that “you ought not question someone’s religious beliefs” is itself a religious belief for pluralists. But this belief is just as exclusive and “intolerant” as any religious belief of a Christian or Muslim. In other words, pluralists think all non-pluralist beliefs are wrong. So pluralists are just as dogmatic and closed-minded as anyone else making truth claims in the public square. And they want everyone who disagrees with them to see things their way.

Third, the prohibition against questioning religious beliefs is also an absolute moral position. Why shouldn’t we question religious beliefs? Would it be immoral to do so? And if so, by whose standard? Do pluralists have any good reasons supporting their belief that we ought not question religious beliefs, or is it just their own personal opinion that they want to impose on the rest of us? Unless they can give us good reasons for such a moral standard, why should we allow them to impose it on us? And why are pluralists trying to impose that moral position on us anyway? That’s not very “tolerant” of them.

Fourth, the Bible commands Christians to question religious beliefs (e.g., Deut. 13:1-5; 1 John 4:1; Gal. 1:8; 2 Cor. 11:13; etc.). Since Christians have a religious belief that they ought to question religious beliefs, then pluralists—according to their own standard—should accept this Christian belief as well. But of course they do not. Ironically, pluralists—advocates of the new tolerance—are not really tolerant at all. They only “tolerate” those who already agree with them, which by anyone’s definition is not tolerance.

Fifth, the pluralist’s claim that we ought not question religious beliefs is a derivative of the false cultural prohibition against making judgments. The “prohibition against judging is false because it fails to meet its own standard: “you ought not judge” is itself a judgment! (Pluralists misinterpret Jesus’ comments on judging [Matt. 7:1-5]. Jesus did not prohibit judging as such, only judging hypocritically.) Indeed, everyone—the pluralist, the Christian, the atheist, the agnostic—makes judgments. So the issue isn’t whether or not we make judgments, but whether or not we make the right judgments.

Finally, are pluralists ready to accept as true the religious beliefs of Muslim terrorists—especially when those beliefs say that all non-Muslims (including pluralists) should be killed? Are they ready to accept as true the religious beliefs of those who believe in child sacrifice or other heinous acts? We hope not.

While we should respect the rights of others to believe what they want, we are foolish, and maybe even unloving, to tacitly accept every religious belief as true. Why is this unloving? Because if Christianity is true, then it would be unloving to suggest to anyone that their opposing religious beliefs are true as well. Affirming such error might keep them on the road to damnation. Instead, if Christianity is true, we ought to kindly tell them the truth because only the truth can set them free.”

Excerpt From: Norman L. Geisler & Frank Turek. “I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist.” Crossway Books. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright.

Check out this book on the iBookstore:

For those who might argue that I’m just blindly accepting logic from a book just because it’s written by people who agree with me, I’d like to share a story with you. I had heard the truth about Islamic beliefs, but had been told that the info was wrong, and at best, had been blown out of proportion. I decided to interview a stranger, and to hear their belief system, and worldview, for myself. I happen to live in a suburb with a large number of Muslims, and decided to interview a normal Muslim mom, a Syrian, while our children played together at the park.
We discussed her head covering, and her reasons for wearing it. She was surprised at meeting a Southern California girl as modest as I am. We talked about chastity, respect for our husbands in marriage, and our beliefs about virginity. We chatted amiably about parenting children in this day and age, but I found myself compassionate concerning her family’s treatment since 9/11. Apparently there were those who would show great disdain for any Muslim after that great tragedy. I finally asked her the big question.
Me:So, there’s a rumor going around Selma, that Muslims believe that any non-Muslims should be killed…umm, is that true? I’m just doing some research of my own…concerning religion…

Selma:(random beautiful Muslim woman at the local park) “Yes, well…we believe, uhh, we believe that if anyone should try to stop Islam, or try to end our faith…that they should, you know, not be on the earth. Yes.”

Me: (while our children link legs to make a body train to go down the slide) “So…non-Muslims? They try to take away Islam? Do they try and take your faith?”

Selma: “Most do, yes.”


10 Comments Add yours

  1. Taryn says:

    No, the fact that your god is evil and cruel is good enough of a reason for me to refuse to worship him even if you could “prove” that he is real. Satan sounds positively nice compared to the god you worship. But the point of my post was that you were implying that Muslims believe that non-muslims should be killed based on that book and one conversation. I was pointing out that based on interactions I’ve had with Christians and one conversation I could very easily imply that all American Christians want to kill non-Christians or at least deport/kill Muslims that are here. But I wouldn’t actually do that since it wouldn’t be honest and I have studied enough to find that not all Muslims believe the same thing.

    In my experience with people who are religious I have found Muslims to be considerable nicer than Christians. And most of them don’t interpret those verse to mean those things, just like there are branches of Christianity that don’t interpret the verses in the Bible about homosexuality to mean that it is a sin. Just because you found Muslims who did doesn’t mean much more than me finding Christians who want to kill non-Christians.

  2. Taryn says:

    True conversation with a fundamental, biblical literalist Christian:

    Him: Our nation(America) is a Christian nation. All of our laws and all behaviors of citizens should reflect a Christian belief system.

    Me: Well what about non-Christians who don’t want to follow Christian teachings?

    Him: They can leave, convert or be killed. This is a Christian nation.

    Me: So you believe everyone in America should be a Christian and those who want to stay and not be Christians should be killed?

    Him: Yes.

    ~He then went on to use the Bible to support his belief~

    So I guess based off one conversation with one Christian and some blogs I read that have said the same thing I should believe that most Christians in America want to kill non-Christians?

    1. Tidbitter says:

      You found a weirdo to interview….

      1. Taryn says:

        And what is to say you didn’t either? I have interacted on the internet with more than one Christian who wants to kill/deport at least Muslims out of this country. In MN a church kicked out two Muslim students during a question and answer time by a Muslim “expert” when they dared to disagree with his claims that Islam is the devil. In my own life I have seen Christians refer to Muslims as “turban heads” “camel jockeys” “stinking Muzzies” and talk about how it would be wonderful to deport all the Muslims and burn down Mosques. You don’t have to look hard at tea party websites and forums to see the Muslim hate there and many of those people also claim to be Christian. So from my point of view it doesn’t appear that Christians are that loving either.

      2. Tidbitter says:

        So Taryn, that’s a reason for you to be an atheist? There’s good and definitely some not-so-good in every group, so therefore there is no God?

  3. Anonymous says:

    Me: Fictional Muslim, can you please say something conveniently crazy so I can misrepresent your religion to my fellow Christians?

    Fictional Muslim: What? Why?

    Me: I like to write and reproduce long boring tracts in order to mislead Christians.

    Fictional Muslim: But why do you need me to say anything? Can’t you just take the concept of monotheism and make it seem inherently suspicious in all other cases but Chrisitianity? Or misrepresent the nature of religious struggle?

    Me: Sure, but I’m going to do that anyway. I just need a soundbite of you saying something creepy to juxtapose with snippets about our children playing together. You see, I’m trying to plant a seed of paranoia and create distrust of Muslims even in the most normal, friendly circumstances.

    Fictional Muslim: Why would do that?

    Me: To promote Christianity, of course.

    Fictional Muslim: You sound insane and truly cruel.

    Me: You think all non-believers are insane and cruel? Can I quote you on that?

    Fictional Muslim: If I say no, are you going to quote me anyway?

    Me: Yep!

    1. L.M. says:

      Sorry about commenting anonymously, I put my name in the email box! BTW, can you please do something about your formatting, it’s really confusing. Some of the bolding and italics seem completely random.

      1. Tidbitter says:

        Sorry you’re confused.

    2. Tidbitter says:

      This conversation is not fictitious. While I have certainly grown to love my Muslim friends, my point was that not all religions are the same, travel the same path, or hold the same beliefs of love, grace, and mercy.
      You, on the other hand, might want to take your dislike of me, J, and other Christians to a counselor or something… 😉

      1. L.M. says:

        I like Christians. I just think your… um… Let’s say… unorthodox relationship with the truth is detrimental to them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s